Months after the Supreme Court removed constitutional protections for abortion, voters in several states moved to preserve access to the procedure.
Voters in California, Michigan and Vermont enshrined reproductive rights of their state constitutions, while Kentucky voters said no to a proposal that might have rejected abortion protections within the state structure. Also coming up short was a Montana abortion-related referendum that raised the prospect of criminal charges for health care providers who provide abortions.
For the reason that end of Roe v. Wade, several states expanded abortion rights, while some sought to ban the practice outright or shorten the viability time. As of the start of November, greater than 10 states banned abortion virtually in all cases, in accordance with the Guttmacher Institute, a research and policy organization that supports abortion rights.
Here’s a have a look at recent events:
- Kansas spurned an initiative to remove abortion rights from its state structure in August.
- Louisiana and Arkansas are amongst several states that barred the procedure even within the case of rape or incest.
- Georgia’s recent abortion law bans the practice sometimes as early as six weeks, often before many individuals know they’re pregnant. That ban is being challenged in court.
Elizabeth Nash, the Guttmacher Institute’s principal policy associate for state issues, said the amendments in California, Michigan and Vermont are crucial because they’re a firewall should anti-abortion lawmakers gain control of the state legislatures.
“We also hope other state legislators can learn and be inspired by this turnout for abortion rights,” Nash said.
OTHER KEY BALLOT MEASURES:Weed, voting, minimum wage and more
The five states – California, Michigan, Vermont, Montana and Kentucky – put reproductive issues before voters in November. Here’s more on how those initiatives are panning out:
Voters go for Michigan’s Proposal 22-3
Michigan’s Proposal 22-3 establishes within the state structure a right to reproductive freedom, including contraception, abortion and sterilization.
The state had a dormant 1931 ban that made aborting a fetus a felony unless it preserves the carrier’s life. The law has not been enforced for the reason that Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, and abortions within the state have continued after courts have blocked the ban.
Michigan’s vote on abortion is available in the identical race that Gov. Gretchen Whitmer won against Republican challenger Tudor Dixon, who opposes the procedure generally. Whitmer, a Democrat, made abortion access an important a part of her campaign.
Californians say yes to Proposition 1
Placed on the ballot in response to the Roe decision, California’s ballot measure to codify abortion protections within the state’s structure was a winner with voters.
The measure, called Proposition 1, protects the appropriate to decide on to have an abortion, in addition to the appropriate to “select or refuse contraceptives.”
Vermont enshrines abortion protections
Before the top of Roe v. Wade, the state already had a 2019 law that assures abortion rights, in accordance with The Associated Press. On Tuesday, voters decided to enshrine reproductive autonomy.
Montana voters reject ‘born alive’ measure
Montana voters have rejected a legislative referendum that raised the prospect of criminal charges for health care providers unless they take “all medically appropriate and reasonable actions to preserve the life” of an infant born alive, including after an attempted abortion.
Health care professionals and other opponents argued the proposal could rob parents of precious time with infants born with incurable medical issues if doctors are forced to aim treatment.
More:Montana voters reject ‘born alive’ abortion referendum
The referendum defined a “born alive infant” as one who breathes, has a beating heart, or has a “definite movement of voluntary muscles” after expulsion or extraction from the mother. Health care providers found guilty of not providing to those born under the act could face imprisonment and a advantageous of up $ 50,000, in accordance with the referendum.
Supporters have told USA TODAY the measure would have protected the lifetime of the young. But opponents say it could have caused medical professionals to disrupt the ultimate moments that terminal infants have with their parents.
Kentucky Amendment 2 defeated
Kentucky voters have defeated Amendment 2, which sought to disclaim the appropriate to an abortion from the state structure. The amendment asked voters: “To guard human life, nothing on this Structure shall be construed to secure or protect a right to abortion or require the funding of abortion.”
And most voters said no.
Abortions within the state were mostly placed on pause amid legal challenges. The state is one in all several that had a trigger law that took effect after Roe was overturned.
READ MORE: Proposed Kentucky constitutional amendment to finish right to an abortion defeated in vote
Rachel Sweet, campaign manager for Protect Kentucky Access, a bunch against the amendment, called the vote “a historic win for the people of Kentucky.”
“Not only does it represent a win against government overreach and government interference within the people of Kentucky’s personal medical decisions, it represents the primary time so many various organizations have come along with such an intense single-minded purpose to defeat a threat of this magnitude , “she said in an announcement cited by the Louisville Courier Journal, a part of the USA TODAY Network.
Contributing: Bill Keveney, USA TODAY; Deborah Yetter, The Louisville Courier Journal; The Associated Press
Tiffany Cusaac-Smith covers race and history for USA TODAY. Click here for her latest stories. Follow her on Twitter @T_Cusaac.
